Map the work before committing to a build.

We document one operational process, identify where automation is useful, define the controls it would require, and provide a written recommendation.

Use an assessment when the problem is clear but the right intervention is not.

The outcome may be an installed workflow, an off-the-shelf tool, a data cleanup project, or a recommendation not to automate.

  • The same process runs often enough to justify a repeatable system.
  • Inputs and outcomes can be described, even if exceptions still require judgment.
  • The workflow crosses several tools or teams and loses context between them.
  • A reviewer can define what an acceptable result looks like.

A decision record you keep.

The assessment is useful whether DecarbDesk implements the recommendation or another team does.

Current-state map
Systems, handoffs, review points, recurring delays, and sources of rework.
Automation candidates
Tasks ranked by expected value, implementation effort, and failure consequence.
Control requirements
Access, approval, evaluation, audit, exception, and human-oversight needs.
Recommended sequence
What to test first, what requires groundwork, and what should remain unchanged.

Three steps from intake to recommendation.

  1. 01

    Fit call

    Describe the workflow, the teams involved, and the decision you need to make.

  2. 02

    Remote assessment

    Walk through the process, review representative inputs, and identify systems, controls, and exceptions.

  3. 03

    Written recommendation

    Receive the current-state map, ranked candidates, control requirements, and proposed sequence.

Fixed assessment fee

$500 CAD

Credited toward an installation if you proceed with DecarbDesk.

Describe the workflow that creates the most uncertainty or rework.

A short email is enough to start. Use project intake when you are ready to provide the systems, review roles, and constraints behind it.